Third-Country Deportations 2026: What They Are, Who Is at Risk, and Your Legal Rights

Third-Country Deportations 2026: What They Are, Who Is at Risk, and Your Legal Rights

One of the most controversial and legally contested immigration enforcement tools of the second Trump administration is the use of third-country deportations — removing immigrants and asylum seekers not to their country of origin, but to a completely different country with which the United States has struck a deportation agreement. As of May 2026, more than 24,000 people have received removal orders to third countries, thousands more have abandoned their asylum claims out of fear, and federal courts are actively litigating the legality of the practice. This guide explains exactly what third-country deportations are, who is at risk, what countries are involved, and what your legal rights are.

What Is a Third-Country Deportation?

A third-country deportation — officially called a “third-country removal” — occurs when the United States deports an individual to a country other than the one they are a citizen of or came from. Under traditional immigration enforcement, a person is removed to their country of nationality. Under the Trump administration’s third-country deportation program, individuals can be sent to any country that has signed a deportation cooperation agreement with the U.S., regardless of whether the person has any connection to that country.

Third-Country Deportations 2026: Who Is at Risk Deporting immigrants to countries other than their country of birth — legal rights explained What Is Third-Country Removal? Normally: deported to country of birth New: deported to cooperating third country even if you have no ties there Destinations used in 2025–26: • El Salvador (CECOT mega-prison) • Panama, Guatemala, Honduras • Rwanda (proposed), Costa Rica Who Is Most at Risk • Nationals of countries that won’t accept deportees (Cuba, Venezuela, etc.) • Anyone with final removal order • Gang-related charges (used broadly) • MS-13 / Tren de Aragua allegations (CECOT transfers challenged in SCOTUS) • Venezuelans, Salvadorans, Hondurans Your Legal Rights Against Third-Country Removal ✓ CAT protection: cannot be sent to country where you face torture (Convention Against Torture) ✓ Due process: SCOTUS (J.G.G. v. Trump) requires notice and opportunity to contest third-country removal ✓ Withholding of removal: if you face persecution in third country, you can apply for protection
You may also like
Immigration attorney reviewing a waiver application form with a client, with a U.S. passport and small American flag on the desk
I-601 Waiver 2026: Extreme Hardship Standard, Who Qualifies & How to Apply

Complete guide to the I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility: who needs it, what grounds it covers, how to prove extreme hardship, I-601 vs…

✓ Habeas corpus: if already removed without notice, you can petition the court that issued removal order visafortheunitedstates.com

Third-country deportations 2026 — what they are, who is at risk, and your legal rights.

–>

For example: a Venezuelan national who entered the U.S. seeking asylum could be deported not to Venezuela, but to El Salvador, Rwanda, or another country that has agreed to receive deportees from the U.S. The person may have no family, no language connection, and no legal status in the destination country.

How Many People Are Affected?

The scale of the third-country removal program has grown dramatically in 2026:

Which Countries Are Accepting U.S. Deportees?

The Trump administration has been aggressive in negotiating deportation cooperation agreements with countries across multiple regions. Key destination countries include:

El Salvador

El Salvador is the most prominent third-country deportation destination. The U.S. pays El Salvador to house deportees in the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) — a maximum-security prison designed for gang members. The initial arrangement involved 238 alleged Tren de Aragua members transferred from the U.S. at a reported cost of $6 million for one year. Human rights organizations have documented severe conditions at CECOT, including reports of torture, enforced disappearances, and lack of due process for those held there.

Panama

Panama has received deportation flights carrying migrants of various nationalities, including from countries in Asia and Africa that have historically been difficult for the U.S. to deport to directly. Panama’s agreement allows the U.S. to use it as a staging ground for onward deportation.

Rwanda and Eswatini (Africa)

Following a model similar to the United Kingdom’s now-defunct Rwanda plan, the U.S. has pursued agreements with African nations to accept deportees. Rwanda and Eswatini have been identified as destination countries, though details of these agreements remain partially classified or undisclosed.

Other Countries (27 Total)

The full list of 27 countries with deportation agreements spans Central America, South America, Africa, and other regions. The administration has not publicly disclosed the complete list of agreements or the financial terms of each arrangement.

Who Is Being Targeted for Third-Country Removal?

Third-country deportations have primarily targeted:

  • Asylum seekers with pending cases — People who entered the U.S. and filed for asylum, whose cases are now being pretermitted (terminated before a full hearing) via motions filed by DHS, with removal ordered to a third country
  • Nationals of countries with no deportation agreement with the U.S. — If the U.S. cannot deport someone to their home country (e.g., because the home country refuses to accept them), the administration is using third-country agreements as an alternative
  • Individuals accused of gang affiliation — The Tren de Aragua and MS-13 designations have been used to justify expedited third-country transfers, sometimes without full adjudication of whether the individual is actually a gang member
  • High-profile enforcement targets — People whom the administration has publicly identified as part of its enforcement priorities, including some who have lived in the U.S. for years

Third-country deportations have generated some of the most significant immigration litigation of the Trump era:

Due Process Ruling (February 2026)

A federal judge ruled in February 2026 that immigrants must be given meaningful notice and a genuine opportunity to raise country-specific objections — including claims of persecution or torture — before being deported to a third country. The ruling recognized that an individual may have a valid fear of harm in a proposed third country even if they have no prior connection to it, and that deporting someone without allowing them to raise this fear violates due process.

El Salvador CECOT Litigation

Multiple lawsuits have been filed challenging the transfers to El Salvador’s CECOT prison, with family members and advocates arguing that the U.S. government transferred individuals without proper legal process and that conditions at CECOT constitute torture. Courts have been struggling with jurisdictional questions — if a person is already in a foreign prison, can U.S. courts order them returned?

Congressional Oversight

Democratic senators have formally requested Inspector General investigations into third-country deportation agreements, arguing that the financial arrangements and conditions of confinement may violate U.S. law and international human rights obligations. As of May 2026, these investigations are ongoing.

What Are Your Rights If You Face Third-Country Removal?

If you have a pending immigration case and are concerned about third-country deportation, understanding your rights is essential:

  • Right to notice: Per the February 2026 federal court ruling, you must receive meaningful notice before being deported to a third country. If you receive any notice or court filing related to third-country removal, contact an immigration attorney immediately.
  • Right to raise fear of persecution in the third country: Even if you have no prior connection to the proposed destination country, you have the right to raise a claim that you would face persecution, torture, or serious harm there. This is sometimes called a “non-refoulement” claim.
  • Right to challenge a pretermission motion: If DHS files a motion to pretermit your asylum case (terminate it before a hearing), you have the right to respond and contest that motion before the immigration judge.
  • Right to legal representation: You have the right to be represented by an attorney in immigration proceedings, though the government is not required to provide one at no cost. Contact a nonprofit immigration legal aid organization if you cannot afford an attorney.
  • Do not abandon your case without legal advice: Many people are being pressured — directly or through fear — into abandoning their asylum claims and accepting voluntary departure. This waives important rights. Before making this decision, consult with an attorney.

The Human Impact: Families and Long-Term Residents

Washington Post reporting from May 2026 revealed a striking demographic shift in who is being deported: nearly a quarter of the 300,000 men removed since January 2025 had lived in the United States for at least three years. Many had U.S.-born children, long work histories, and deep community ties. The combination of third-country agreements, accelerated enforcement, and the fear-driven abandonment of asylum claims is reshaping entire communities, separating families and removing people who had built lives in the U.S. over years or decades.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the U.S. really deport me to a country I’ve never been to?
The administration is attempting to do exactly this. Courts have pushed back, requiring meaningful notice and the opportunity to raise fear claims. However, if you do not raise objections and request legal review, deportation to a third country can proceed. Legal representation is critical.

What is a “motion to pretermit” my asylum case?
A pretermission motion is a filing by DHS asking the immigration judge to terminate your asylum case before a full hearing, often citing third-country removal agreements. You have the right to respond to this motion.

If I’m sent to El Salvador’s CECOT prison, can I get out?
This is one of the most contested legal questions currently before the courts. Judges have questioned whether U.S. courts retain jurisdiction over individuals held in foreign prisons under U.S.-funded agreements. Litigation is ongoing — contact an attorney or advocacy organization immediately if a family member is in this situation.

Should I accept voluntary departure to avoid third-country deportation?
Do not make this decision without consulting an immigration attorney. Voluntary departure waives certain rights and may bar future immigration benefits. An attorney can help you weigh the specific risks in your case.

Share: